Tel Aviv Derby Cancelled Due to Violent Riots
-
- By Judy Chang
- 09 Mar 2026
The England head coach despised the term Bazball from its inception, deeming it reductive and maybe anticipating how it could be weaponised in the future. Right now, trailing 2-0 in an Test series in Australia that began with great expectations, it has become the butt of Australian jokes.
However the coach has not helped himself either. After the crushing loss at the Gabba, his insistence that, if anything, England were 'over-prepared' prior to the pink-ball match was like trying to put out a bin fire with petrol. It could become his epitaph as national coach if performances do not take an upturn.
On one level, one must admire his dedication to the philosophy. While he claims to ignore external noise, he will have been all too aware of an England team often described as carefree and lacking preparation.
The reality, as always, is not so simple. England play as much golf during their scheduled breaks as their rivals and they practice equally hard. Before the Gabba Test, they trained for longer, logging five days compared to Australia's three, given their lack of exposure to the pink ball and the changes in seeing conditions.
The coach's point about being "excessively ready" was that those additional training days were his call – the instance he blinked in his conviction that minimal preparation is best. It suggested a significant amount of focus was expended before they even stepped out in the cauldron of Australia's fortress. While nets are a chance to iron out skills, they can also become a safety blanket; low-pressure work that simply maintains the reflexes sharp.
Fixtures are congested such that warm-up matches against state sides were unavailable (with uncertain value, as shown by England having played three before the 5-0 series loss in 2013-14). What is harder to square is the disregard of domestic red-ball cricket as a valuable experience more broadly, evidenced by Jacob Bethell's unproductive season.
Only playing prepares cricketers for the various scenarios they walk out to face, and it is in this area where England have thus far fallen well short. It is not only with the batting – as poor as some of the decision-making has been – but an attack that seems without a spearhead. None has demonstrated the persistence or discipline that the otherworldly Mitchell Starc and his teammates have displayed.
The coach's unconventional outlook was liberating during its first 12 months, an excellent, well diagnosed remedy to eradicate the lethargy that came before. The disappointment now comes in how it has apparently not evolved past that point – an absence of an second phase to the original software that has seen results taper off to 14 wins and 14 losses from their last 30 Tests.
One such player is Jamie Smith, a gifted player, undoubtedly, but one who is being mercilessly targeted on both edges and has dropped two crucial opportunities with the gloves. It probably does not help when your opposite number, the Australian keeper, has just delivered a virtuoso performance.
Going by the coach's comments after the match, England look likely to keep the faith with Smith in Adelaide. The hope – as is the case – is that a switch to a more familiar match environment unleashes his top form, with Perth's bouncy pitch and the unfamiliar floodlit Test now in the past.
Another option is to implement the plan discovered during the series win in New Zealand last year by moving Ollie Pope down to his more natural home as a active No. 5 or 6, giving him the gloves, and picking a fresh face at first drop. Bethell made some runs for the Lions recently, or perhaps an all-rounder could fulfil a comparable function to the former spinner in 2023.
In the end, none of this is ideal, with Australia's better fundamentals having shattered pre-series optimism and pushed the broader philosophy into the spotlight.
A passionate gamer and strategy enthusiast with years of experience in competitive gaming and content creation.