Tel Aviv Derby Cancelled Due to Violent Riots
-
- By Judy Chang
- 09 Mar 2026
This talented musician continually felt the pressure of her father’s legacy. Being the child of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the most famous English composers of the turn of the 20th century, her reputation was cloaked in the long shadows of history.
Not long ago, I sat with these shadows as I prepared to record the inaugural album of Avril’s concerto for piano composed in 1936. With its impassioned harmonies, soulful lyricism, and valiant rhythms, Avril’s work will provide audiences fascinating insight into how she – a wartime composer who entered the world in 1903 – envisioned her world as a female composer of color.
Yet about shadows. It requires time to adapt, to perceive forms as they really are, to separate fact from misrepresentation, and I was reluctant to face her history for some time.
I deeply hoped her to be following in her father’s footsteps. To some extent, this was true. The idyllic English tones of parental inspiration can be observed in several pieces, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to review the headings of her father’s compositions to understand how he identified as not just a flag bearer of British Romantic style and also a voice of the Black diaspora.
It was here that Samuel and Avril seemed to diverge.
American society judged Samuel by the mastery of his art as opposed to the his ethnicity.
While he was studying at the prestigious music college, Samuel – the offspring of a African father and a British mother – started to lean into his background. Once the Black American writer the renowned Dunbar visited the UK in that era, the young musician eagerly sought him out. He set Dunbar’s African Romances as a composition and the next year used the poet’s words for an opera, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral work that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.
Inspired by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, Samuel’s Hiawatha was an global success, particularly among African Americans who felt shared pride as American society judged Samuel by the excellence of his art as opposed to the his background.
Recognition failed to diminish his beliefs. During that period, he participated in the initial Pan African gathering in London where he encountered the African American intellectual the renowned Du Bois and observed a series of speeches, such as the mistreatment of African people in South Africa. He was an activist until the end. He kept connections with trailblazers for equality like the scholar and this leader, spoke publicly on equality for all, and even discussed racial problems with the US President on a trip to the presidential residence in 1904. In terms of his art, reminisced Du Bois, “he made his mark so prominently as a creative artist that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He passed away in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. However, how would Samuel have thought of his offspring’s move to travel to this country in the mid-20th century?
“Daughter of Famous Composer expresses approval to South African policy,” ran a headline in the community journal Jet magazine. Apartheid “seems to me the appropriate course”, the composer stated Jet. Upon further questioning, she qualified her remarks: she did not support with the system “in principle” and it “should be allowed to work itself out, directed by benevolent South Africans of all races”. Were the composer more in tune to her family’s principles, or raised in segregated America, she may have reconsidered about this system. But life had shielded her.
“I hold a English document,” she remarked, “and the authorities never asked me about my race.” Thus, with her “fair” appearance (according to the magazine), she traveled within European circles, supported by their acclaim for her late father. She gave a talk about her family’s work at the Cape Town university and directed the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in Johannesburg, featuring the bold final section of her concerto, named: “In memory of my Father.” Although a skilled pianist on her own, she avoided playing as the featured artist in her concerto. Instead, she consistently conducted as the leader; and so the apartheid orchestra played under her baton.
The composer aspired, according to her, she “might bring a transformation”. But by 1954, things fell apart. After authorities discovered her African heritage, she was forced to leave the country. Her citizenship failed to safeguard her, the UK representative advised her to leave or risk imprisonment. She went back to the UK, deeply ashamed as the scale of her innocence dawned. “This experience was a difficult one,” she stated. Increasing her embarrassment was the printing that year of her ill-fated Jet interview, a year after her unceremonious exit from South Africa.
Upon contemplating with these legacies, I sensed a recurring theme. The narrative of being British until it’s revoked – one that calls to mind troops of color who served for the English throughout the global conflict and lived only to be denied their due compensation. And the Windrush generation,
A passionate gamer and strategy enthusiast with years of experience in competitive gaming and content creation.