Tel Aviv Derby Cancelled Due to Violent Riots
-
- By Judy Chang
- 09 Mar 2026
Do your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?
If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.
Numerous female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.
Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.
The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.
Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.
In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.
Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.
A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.
"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.
Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease substantially.
The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.
Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.
"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."
She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."
Some testers experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.
"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.
These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.
Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.
According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.
The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."
Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.
As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.
"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."
A passionate gamer and strategy enthusiast with years of experience in competitive gaming and content creation.